Click here for a list of previous KNews columns ISDN still kicks IP's butt, Apparently… by Gary Kayye,
CTS |
||||
|
|
A1: I would say that 95% of the current VTC installs are ISDN only. The remaining 5% are IP only, or IP and ISDN combinations using a Gateway device. However, some clients who are implementing ISDN-only right now are specifying the installation of equipment that will seamlessly support both ISDN and IP (in the future), without additional cost. So, even though the near-term option is ISDN, an increasing number of clients are thinking IP and are clearly planning to go in that direction eventually.
The primary advantage
of using an IP-based network is cost management. Clients who have purchased
dedicated network bandwidth know what their costs are going to be on
a month-to-month basis. Theoretically, they could be using their videoconferencing
systems 24/7 over their dedicated network without incurring additional
usage costs. ISDN is usage-based, and frequent users can rack up significant
network charges. This is exponentially increased for international usage.
A cost-benefit analysis should be done in Another benefit
is quality of service. ISDN is a public-switched digital-network, which
can be routed through Telcos [telephone companies] in a number of different
ways - and in my experience, is sometimes subject to potential congestion
and quality issues. A dedicated internal intranet/VPN essentially guarantees
that the network is 'clean' and available from one end to the other. Lastly, another
advantage of doing video over IP is speed. For those clients looking
for IP/ISDN video conferencing, they can invest in a lower-cost system
which supports lower ISDN line speeds, but still can 'cook' at 768kbps
over IP. Systems exist that can support up to 2Mbps over an Ethernet
network. Easy-to-use Desktop video is now a reality at 384kbps over
Ethernet.
[an error occurred while processing this directive] ![]()
For more news and feature articles, return to PresentationMaster home page.
|
|||
|
|